Plumbiferous Media

Give It Up - Zelienople

Dec 24th 2009
No Comments
respond
trackback
Give It Up - ZelienopleZelienople
Give It Up
Score: 39








Zelieno­ple, a Chicago band named after a Penn­syl­va­nia bor­ough, com­bines ele­ments from post-rock, shoegaze, and drone. Their newest LP, Give It Up, released ear­lier this month, dis­plays Zelienople’s approach to this increas­ingly com­mon com­bi­na­tion of gen­res, falling squarely into the realm of the ambi­ent. How­ever, a lack of real inno­va­tion or cre­ativ­ity pre­vents Give It Up from being much more than another fairly generic ambi­ent album.

Vocally, both Give It Up and Zelieno­ple as a whole rely upon sub­dued words from Matt Chris­tensen - unsur­pris­ing given the post-rock influ­ence inher­ent to Zelienople’s music. Christensen’s voice acts as a layer below and through the music, float­ing air­ily by the ear. This tech­nique can be used well, but on Give It Up it gen­er­ally means that the vocals come in at such a low level that, once the music has slipped by as largely unre­mark­able, the vocals don’t have the energy to bring it back. It is impor­tant to note that the vocals do occa­sion­ally work well with the music, but it’s gen­er­ally only for a sec­ond - and it’s not so much laud­able as it is surprising.

Given the vocal style of Give It Up, the gen­eral lack of clearly intel­li­gi­ble lyrics is fairly nor­mal. How­ever, in this case, rather than ele­vat­ing the vocals to the sort of organic sound found in some of the best exam­ples of music of this style, this instead allows the vocals to fade into a posi­tion of even lower impor­tance. Rep­e­ti­tion cer­tainly doesn’t help this, espe­cially when it’s of the least com­pelling sec­tions of the vocal track.

There is very lit­tle that is truly, instantly iden­ti­fi­able as wrong with Give It Up. Yes, the album attempts to approx­i­mate a dark, flow­ing sound but ends up, more than any­thing, sound­ing entirely too arti­fi­cial (the shoddy echo effect and other effects placed on top of the vocals cer­tainly do not help in the slight­est). And granted, there are occa­sional teeth-grinding moments, for exam­ple, what can only be assumed to be the musi­cal rep­re­sen­ta­tion of a water saw (on the track of that title) that sounds like one’s head­phones slowly being torn apart by a grain mill. But for the most part, the sounds of the album are rel­a­tively harm­less, occa­sion­ally inter­est­ing, and, at least, not unpleasant.

The over­ly­ing prob­lem with the album then is that “rel­a­tively harm­less” and “occa­sion­ally inter­est­ing” is, as a whole, not very inter­est­ing at all. After the first seven-minute-long track has finally ended, the lis­tener knows almost all the mate­r­ial on the album. Most of the album passes by com­pletely unno­ticed, and the parts that pop out of the rest of the frame­work are usu­ally the parts that would have bet­ter been left out. So even though lis­ten­ing to the album itself is not par­tic­u­larly irri­tat­ing, it leaves a fairly unpleas­ant taste in the mouth.

Give It Up is not a great album. While it’s gen­er­ally not all that bad, its near-complete lack of unique­ness is one of the less pleas­ant forms. The album’s utter lack of diver­sity, gen­eral mediocre sound, botched mix­ing, and occa­sional bla­tant flaws is not exactly a for­mula for a strong album. Give It Up is sim­ply not very good.


This post is tagged ,

Leave a Reply